2016 377

And that is probably the most important aspect of this election that Obama’s policy of terror comes to an end.

The media didn’t want to believe Trump could win. So they looked the other way. - Comment on 2016 November 9 (2)

Website: countdown4us.com
Home | Comments | Creation | Redemption Period | Miscellaneous
Home > Comments > 2016 > Comment on 2016 November 9 (2)
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012  |  2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
End: Go to the end of this webpage.
Previous webpage: 2016 376     Next webpage: 2016 378


Obama had destroyed the peaceful cooperation between nations and instigated wars all over the world and were he could not start a war, he pursued regime change. Every nation and every person that refused to worship Obama got persecuted. Read more:

First some extracts from an article and then some comments:

To put it bluntly, the media missed the story. In the end, a huge number of American voters wanted something different. And although these voters shouted and screamed it, most journalists just weren’t listening. They didn’t get it.

They didn’t get that the huge, enthusiastic crowds at Donald Trump’s rallies would really translate into that many votes. They couldn’t believe that the America they knew could embrace someone who mocked a disabled man, bragged about sexually assaulting women, and spouted misogyny, racism and anti-Semitism.

It would be too horrible. So, therefore, according to some kind of magical thinking, it couldn’t happen.

Journalists - college-educated, urban and, for the most part, liberal - are more likely than ever before to live and work in New York City and Washington, D.C., or on the West Coast. And although we touched down in the big red states for a few days, or interviewed some coal miners or unemployed autoworkers in the Rust Belt, we didn’t take them seriously. Or not seriously enough.

And Trump - who called journalists scum and corrupt - alienated us so much that we couldn’t see what was before our eyes. We just kept checking our favorite prognosticating sites and feeling reassured, even though everyone knows that poll results are not votes.

After all, you never know who’ll show up to vote, especially when votes are being suppressed as never before. And even the most Clinton-leaning prognosticators allowed for some chance of a Trump win.

But no one seemed to believe it in their bones. We would have President Clinton, went the journalistic conventional wisdom, and although she would be flawed, she would be a known quantity. There was a kind of comfort there.

Make no mistake. This is an epic fail. And although eating crow is never appealing, we’ll be digesting feathers and beaks in the next weeks and months - and maybe years.

"The media is always taking Trump literally. It never takes him seriously, but it always takes him literally,"¯Thiel said. Journalists wanted to know exactly how he would deport that many undocumented immigrants, or exactly how Trump would rid the world of the Islamic State. We wanted details.

But a lot of voters think the opposite way: They take Trump seriously but not literally.

They realize, Thiel said, that Trump doesn’t really plan to build a wall. "What they hear is, ‘We’re going to have a saner, more sensible immigration policy.’"

Trump, quite apparently, captured the anger that Americans were feeling about issues such as trade and immigration.

And although many journalists and many news organizations did stories about the frustration and disenfranchisement of these Americans, we did not take them seriously enough.

One person, who really helped Trump’s campaign, was probably Obama.

Every time he made a hate speech against Trump, more Americans decided, to vote for Trump.

In the year 2008 Obama already messed up Ms Clinton’s attempt to get back into the White House and her second attempt was now also again ruined with the help of Obama.

The writer of this article believes that the media did not want to believe that Trump could win. But that is just a minor aspect of the media. The main aspect of the media is that they waged a propaganda war against Trump. They were completely immersed in agitation and propaganda for Hillary Clinton and against Donald Trump. And that was not just an American phenomenon, it was worldwide.

It was nearly impossible to get information what was really said by the nominees.

Trump had to get his tactic into action, to produce negative statements to get into the media at all.

And there were plenty of direct wrong reports. For example, it was often stated, that Trump had no concept regarding foreign policy. And it was exactly his foreign policy statements that allowed an observer to hear what kind of policy Trump was representing. And they were the exact opposite of the foreign policy of Obama

Obama had destroyed the peaceful cooperation between nations and instigated wars all over the world and were he could not start a war, he pursued regime change. Every nation and every person that refused to worship Obama got persecuted.

The Obama fans and worshippers – the atheists – acted the same way, as the followers of Antichrist acted two thousand years ago, those who called themselves, and still call themselves Orthodoxy. They created a so-called church history that made devils out the true Christians and out of themselves they made pious people. When one wants to get an idea what these people were whom they condemned and what they taught, one only had the quotations of these persecuted people, which could be found in the works of the so-called church fathers.

And so it is with the media today, one would only get info about Trump, when the media quoted him in order to harm him.

On this website we had 2016 Feb 24 (2) – It’s a US coup and there was this:

Regime change elements which gripped countries like Libya and Egypt have crept into South Africa.

ANC secretary-general Gwede Mantashe set off a social media frenzy yesterday when he charged that clandestine meetings, promoting regime change in South Africa, were being held regularly at the US Embassy in Pretoria.

Mantashe accuses envoy of plotting regime change

"We are aware of the meetings taking place regularly at the American embassy."

"Those meetings in the American embassy are about nothing else other than mobilisation of regime change."

And then there was 2016 May 12 – BRICS countries are a vulnerable to the threat of regime change by western countries and there this is found:

The destabilisation of the BRICS countries is very very clear.

“As we mobilise our people, we must say be vigilant. You must see through anarchy and people who are out there in a programme of regime change. We are aware of the meetings taking place regularly at the American embassy,” Mantashe told thousands of ANC supporters at the Union Buildings in Pretoria.

Just hours after Trump’s victory became apparent, one could hear voices from the American embassy in Pretoria, pledging allegiance to the new man in the White House. These civil servants know where their monthly salary comes from.

The intensive effort of the American embassy in Pretoria, to bring about a regime change in South Africa, has probably come to a sudden end today.

And that is probably the most important aspect of this election that Obama’s policy of terror comes to an end.

But that does not necessarily mean that Obama comes to an end.

He is actually quite a young man. Already compared to Trump. But his grandmother is reported to be still alive in Kenya. And maybe even is grandfather in Hawaii. His grandmother in Hawaii was reported to have died when he became president. So he may have quite a future in front of him – to pursue his terroristic activity.

Maybe this is just the setback reported in the Bible. Worldwide he still enjoys huge popularity and for a man who wants to become the leader of the world that is definitely helpful.

The news of this day shows that there is not just a large group of people in America, that do not go along with Obama, but that it is actually the majority.

This majority could not really express itself in all the years of the Obama time, because it did not a have voice. And already before the Obama time there was none to lead them and that is why Obama came to power in the first place. The leaders of the Republican Party were just useless and wash-outs. Instead of undertaking everything to get Obama out of the White House and behind bars, they supported his policy of worldwide destabilisation.

But as soon as one man stood up and stood up against Obama, the majority of Americans rallied behind him.

So the media didn’t want to believe Trump could win. But that was not just the position of the media, it also affected politicians.

The example is Norbert Röttgen, chairman of the Foreign Committee in the Bundestag. He is "clearly shocked." He is asked whether Germany is sufficiently prepared for the possibility of cooperation with a President Donald Trump. He says: "No, we are not. " And he says: "I am shocked about this, what has taken place."

Something like this could not happen to Angela Merkel. Her politics have now failed, but that does not mean that she is shocked. It is just an obstacle for her that can be bypassed. In a certain sense it is also a victory for her. Her fellow applicant for world domination, Obama, has suffered a setback, and it is now her, for the moment, who is regarded as the figure, who is the leading person, of all those, who strive towards the world rule of the atheists and expect the big breakthrough.

But the normal politicians in Germany are shocked. Because actually they are all the successors of communism. In the Bundestag there is no anti-communist party. That was the CDU many years ago, under Adenauer, but since Barzel, anti-communism is regarded as abolished and as taboo.

That a politician is shocked, one could still understand, but that that what happens in his interior immediately come out of his mouth - that he suffers from verbal diarrhoea - really shows what kind of politicians a country has.

Obama and Merkel stood behind the murder in Kiev; they did everything to get regime change in the Ukraine.

Here something from 2016 Jan 23 – It must look democratic:

With other words America intends to topple governments in other countries.

And the best example is the Ukraine.

20 Days ago we had this news, 2016 January 03 (3):

2016 010
2016 January 3 (3)
Poisoned fruit of EU
Study: Opposition supported by West has committed Maidan massacre
After analyses of thousands of pieces of documentary evidence, study of University Ottawa comes to the result: The shots against the demonstrators on the Maidan did not come from the government, but out of the ranks of the opposition supported by the West. Since the 1st of January the Ukraine is associated with the EU – one poisoned, late fruit of violence of the Maidan.

This mass murder goes probably directly back to an initiative of Obama and Merkel.

So as there was no alternative in America to Obama before Trump, so there is now no alternative to Merkel in Germany.

It seems as if the Obama Merkel politics has suffered for now a setback. But Ms Merkel will certainly manage it.


Like a city whose walls are broken down
is a man who lacks self-control.
Proverbs 25:28


Previous webpage: 2016 376     Next webpage: 2016 378
Back to: 2016 November 9 (2)
Top: Go to the top of this webpage.
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012  |  2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
Home | Comments | Creation | Redemption Period | Miscellaneous
Site Map: For an overview of this website and for access to the individual webpages.
The web address of this webpage is: