What America says will matter nothing.

Who cares what Obama says? - Comment on 2011 June 4

Website: countdown4us.com
Home | Comments | Creation | Redemption Period | Miscellaneous
Home > Comments > 2011 > Comment on 2011 June 4

2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |

2011 June 4
Indeed, Obama’s policy towards the Middle East – whatever it is – sometimes appears so muddled that it is scarcely worthy of study. He supports, of course, democracy – then admits that this may conflict with America’s interests. Read more:

Today I read an article from which I got the above quote and before I am now going to make some comments to what I read, I will first bring some more quotes from this article to get a better idea what it is all about:


The US has manoeuvred itself into a position of complete irrelevance in the Middle East.

US President Barack Obama’s pandering to Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has contributed to losing the US what little respect it still had in the Arab region.

This month in the Middle East has seen the unmaking of the president of the US.

More than that, it has witnessed the lowest prestige of America in the region …

Obama waffled on about change in the Middle East, and about America’s new role in the region. It was pathetic.

Arabs are turning their backs on America, not out of fury or anger, not with threats or violence, but with contempt.

Indeed, Obama’s policy towards the Middle East – whatever it is – sometimes appears so muddled that it is scarcely worthy of study. He supports, of course, democracy – then admits that this may conflict with America’s interests.

To those Arabs prepared to listen to Obama’s spineless oration, this was a grovel too far.

Who cares in the Middle East what Obama says? Not even, it seems, the Israelis.

What America says will matter nothing.


So far the quotes and now some comments.

“Who cares in the Middle East what Obama says?” we just read and there might be a country in the Middle East that cares - to a certain extent - what Obama says and that might be Iran.

And Obama’s policy might be directed towards this care – towards this care of this country – and the article I just quoted from, might be a prove for Obama that his policy is successful, at least the writer of that article seemed to have fallen victim to Obama’s policy and so he – Obama – might hope that Iran falls victim to his policy as well.

The writer of the article uses expressions like irrelevance, unmaking, lowest prestige, waffle, pathetic, contempt, muddle, spineless, grovel, and these expressions are there to describe the policy of Obama and the writer might be correctly describing this policy, he just does not seem to get it that there is a method behind it, and that he, the writer, is not getting this, that he, the writer, is deceived, deceived by the great deceiver, and that this great deceiver hopes to also deceive Iran the same way.

Now Obama is in power since the 20th of January 2009, more than two years now, nearly two and a half years, and his achievements are basically that there are no achievements. The climax of this lack of achievements was on the 2nd November 2010 when the voters of his country voted against him, letting his party lose seats in the legislature.

There is only one exception to his lack of achievements and that is what happened on the 2nd of May 2011, this year, when America eliminated its most wanted man, bin Laden. America was hunting this man not only for years, but for decades. So the hunt was not initiated by Obama, it had been the business of that country for a long time, but Obama seems to have also made it his personal business, he focussed on it and did seemingly all preparations the right way and did not act hastily but waited until the time was ripe. He made a good job of it, especially when one compares the execution of it with a similar job which his friend, Jimmy Carter, tried to do more than three decades ago – in Iran – which also involved military stile action in another country not at war with the US.

Now this success of Obama, actually it was a success of the US, but Obama made it also his success, was his only real achievement up to now and the next achievement he hopes to achieve the same way: a military intervention to save the world from an evil state. And this evil state has to be provoked to become more evil than it is now and that is what his policy is all about, causing Iran to become aggressive and attacking its neighbours and he hopes to achieve this by letting Iran think that he, Obama, has all the traits the writer of the above mentioned article assigns to Obama and that Iran can conquer and become the undisputed lord of that region without Obama doing anything about it.

The subject Iran has again and again been dealt with on this website. Some webpages are for example:
2011 Feb 04 – The Arab revolt
2011 Feb 17 – Will Iran push westward?
2011 Feb 23 – Will Iran attack its neighbours?

Now in Libya Obama had to do something there, intervene, otherwise he would have lost face, but he did it in such a way, that he does not appear as the leader of that intervention and left that role to Nato and in public it appears that mainly two Nato countries are in charge there and that are Britain and France, the two Nato countries in Europe that can really defend themselves, the other Nato countries in Europe are rather depending on being defended by others. And for this reason Germany probably keeps out of this intervention, because the treaty does not call for action, and as a relatively defenceless country it would be advisable not to get involved in such intervention.

Taking constructive actions is not an ability of Obama. The time so far he spent in office has shown this. But destructive actions are his real true ability. The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. The prophecies describe this the following way:

You will then be able to observe the events as it is prophesied to you because it will all take place in the age of a man who is accelerating as it were the dissolving, who pays tribute to the destructive principle, who is therefore not constructive but destructive.

So Obama is working on this event and the planning for it is probably advancing well and his ability as a great deceiver will come into full play and is already in full play and he probably hopes that this great success will happen before the 6th of November 2012 so that it helps with his re-election.

And then, when he successfully has become the saviour of the world, then also people like the writer of above mentioned article will change their mind and start writing positively about him, and start worshiping him. And so they all are heading for the pit.

What is really going on in world affairs, in worldly world affairs and in spiritual world affairs, seems to be seen by very, very few people. It seems that only a quite good knowledge of the prophecies can prevent a person from not being drawn into the sphere of influence created by this man.

That a democratically elected head of government uses his position to establish a dictatorship has happened before and when the Federal Republic of Germany was planned then this experience played a major role and the fathers of that republic had their past experience very much in mind, but for the present time this possibility seems to be completely missing in the minds of observers and politicians, even in the minds of the politicians of the opposition in America.

A few days ago Joe Biden was reported of having thought loudly in public whether he should run 2016 and that could mean that also he thinks that democracy will continue to exist after Obama and that would mean that also he is not aware what is going. But if he is aware of the real intentions of the present president, if he even consciously supports them, then it could be a further attempt of deception, that everything is fine and democracy will continue, and the present president will do his turn and then the next will come.


Back to: 2011 June 4


2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |

Home | Comments | Creation | Redemption Period | Miscellaneous

For an overview of this website and for access to the individual webpages go to:
Site Map

The web address of this webpage is: