A grand jury this year criticized the panel and church officials for leaving dozens of problem priests in ministry.

USA diocese’s sex-abuse chair blasts cardinal - Comment on 2011 May 14 (3)

Website: countdown4us.com
Home | Comments | Creation | Redemption Period | Miscellaneous
Home > Comments > 2011 > Comment on 2011 May 14 (3)

2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |

2011 May 14 (3)
What will it take for bishops to accept that their attitude of superiority and privilege only harms their image and the church's? Church officials focus on lawsuits and liability concerns instead of ridding the church of pedophiles. Read more:

The head of the Philadelphia archdiocese's panel on priest sex-abuse is blasting the cardinal's response to the pedophilia crisis, and pulling back the curtain on the panel's long-secret operations.

Cardinal Justin Rigali and his bishops "failed miserably at being open and transparent," review board chairwoman Ana Maria Catanzaro wrote this week in the lay Catholic magazine Commonweal.

"What will it take for bishops to accept that their attitude of superiority and privilege only harms their image and the church's?" Catanzaro wrote in an article titled "The Fog of Scandal."

A grand jury this year criticized the panel and church officials for leaving dozens of problem priests in ministry.

But Catanzaro said the lay board never saw most of them because the archdiocese prescreened which cases they reviewed.

"She should feel very, very used," said Nicholas Cafardi, a Duquesne University law professor who once served as counsel to the Pittsburgh archdiocese. "They're being asked to give credibility to a process that is supposed to involve them but didn't."

The Philadelphia grand jury charged two priests, an ex-priest and a teacher with rape and a monsignor with endangering children through priest transfers. The report said 37 suspected abusers remained on duty.

Rigali, in response, said he knew of no priest still working in the archdiocese with "an admitted or established accusation of sexual abuse of a minor against them." But he later suspended about 24 priests.

The archdiocese also said it wouldn't investigate a complaint until law enforcement authorities had completed their investigation.

Catanzaro has spent eight years on the review board, which makes recommendations to Rigali on whether priests should remain in ministry. She faulted church officials for focusing on lawsuits and liability concerns instead of ridding the church of pedophiles.

Catanzaro also complained that the panel is told to weigh church, or canon, law on the subject of sexual abuse, not civil law, leading to what she called heated arguments between panel members and three canon lawyers who assist the panel.

"We should expect better from the church and from our bishops. Although concerns about liability can be legitimate, addressing the abuse scandal from a legalistic perspective focused on protecting the archdiocese from liability is simply wrong," she wrote.

 

Back to: 2011 May 14 (3)

 

2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |

Home | Comments | Creation | Redemption Period | Miscellaneous

For an overview of this website and for access to the individual webpages go to:
Site Map

The web address of this webpage is:
http://www.countdown4us.com/en022011/en022011061.htm